Often Software Testing Companies in UAE thinks automated testing as a magic wand that can fix all the software issues and please the client. But in reality this is not the case. It should be rightly pointed that manual and automated testing are two sides of the same coin. The testing team which finds the right balance would turn out victorious.

Finding the Right Balance

Let’s debate and analyse the two sides.

Automated testing has brought down the human workload and shortened the time to market. Also, there is a lot of misconception that automated testing, as it is seen as a switch that can be plugged in would set the whole application free of bugs.

But this is often not the case. The right part and test suite which should be planned for automated testing should be rightly understood. One can write automated testing scripts and run them parallelly to the code of application, but that would not solve the ultimate issue. It can help you test the mechanical issues in depth, but it cannot add the human touch to it.

An automated test plan can correctly pinpoint what the cause for the software glitch is, but it will check the use cases under selected scenarios which are mostly confined into human-generated situations and boundaries for test input values.

What if the test engineer in software development Company in UAE could not figure out the most critical test cases?

The real impact would be that a test report is generated for all the services and subsystems of the software and individual classes of test cases remains unaffected throughout.

So how to strike the right balance?

As discussed earlier, striking the right balance would happen only when both automated and manual testing are analysed based on the needs of the situation alo0ng with the pros and cons.

When To Use Manual And Automated Testing?

Although automated testing is gaining quick ground, when it comes to test management, manual testing cannot be ignored. Besides, QA teams often find manual testing to be more useful in some cases. The only problems that the companies need to be solved is to decide and understand which method will do their best work in any situation.

Here are some scenarios where quality analyst teams should look forward to manual testing instead of automated testing.

Case 1:  Flexibility Required

Often manual testing is not as accurate as automated testing, even then manual processed offer more flexibility to testers for their operations. Automation are more suited for repeating cases, which means that the same code and scripts will be used over and over again.

If testers in Software Company Dubai decide to work with automation, they need to create test cases, program them with the automation tool and run the test. This whole process takes time whereas with manual testing, testers can quickly test and get output instantly.

Case 2: Short Projects

Automation requires planning and investment and both are not required in short term projects because of the cost involved. In such cases manual testing works best.

Case 3:  Usability Testing

An applications success or failure is significantly decided by its usability. And to test the usability factor, testers need manual testing. Automated testing can never be fool proof it cannot provide feedback that manual testing can provide.

For example, while automated testing can easily detect code errors, it won’t be able to explain the user interaction with the app features and how they will maneuver through it. 

Conclusion

At the end of the day, it is best to evaluate the return on investment while deciding to choose between automation and manual testing.

Automating requires time to analyze, code, and maintain. So it should be thought out wisely.